Now more than ever, industrial operations and manufacturers are racing to ‘unlock’ process data to leverage their plant-floor information. It’s the challenge of the decade. In order to address this challenge, we need to be looking at what time-series databases and data historians can do.Correct use of these database technologies will mean the difference between simply having data, and being able to analyse and use data to maintain operations and improve the performance of the plant.
So which is better for your plant? We compare the strengths and limitations of the more traditional data historians and the newer open-source time-series databases to find out.
Data historians are built for niche industries, such as pharmaceuticals, oil and gas, manufacturing, and any kind of process engineering. Those historians specific to manufacturing are designed to measure specific production processes, such as:
Plus, they have:
For decades, industrial data historians have collected vast amounts of data. But the full potential of this data has been largely unrealised. In many cases, it’s remained ‘locked’ in the historians, never to be used by operations and maintenance staff. Since historians exist within niche markets, the software development and skillset required is highly specialised, making them expensive and hard to break into.
Other limitations of traditional enterprise data historians include:
Most time-series databases are open source, as they were developed by Google and other internet companies. Though they haven’t been designed with industrial process data in mind, these databases were built to handle any non-relational data (or NoSQL). Think of tracking the likes, comments, scrolls and uploads of billions of Facebook users in real-time across time, and you’ll get an idea of the mammoth amount of data these databases can deal with.
Here’s what these open-source products can offer:
Resource: Open source time series database comparison (open source Google document).
The biggest limitation of open source time-series databases is in their lower install base for industrial industries. While the technology is safe, reliable and faster than traditional historians (and has been used by major tech companies for more than a decade), it is fairly new to industrial industries.
This means these companies who want to adopt open-source time-series databases will need to have a willingness to be innovative, and a desire to be at the leading edge of data technology in their industry. This approach may not suit everyone, but those who choose time-series will undoubtedly remain competitive and future-proof their operations.
There’s nothing particularly bad about data historians, but the current technology certainly limits an organisation’s ability to grow into a more integrated operation, link data to other softwares and harness data more powerfully. What’s more, time-series databases such as NoSQL have provided the foundation for machine learning and other disruptive technologies.
As a Mckinsey & Company report highlights, business leaders need to update their strategies to account for these disruptive technologies and ‘not be afraid to look beyond established models’. Otherwise, it will be too late for businesses to capture the benefits.
Catch up on database technologies for industrial in our other blog posts and case studies:
1. Data analysis: why process historians and time-series are essential
2. How Google gave rise to time-series databases
3. How TasWater reduced data costs with Nukon's time series configuration sync tool